• 2010 Credit Suit
• Liars & Cheats
• CreditFactors
• Fight Back!!!
• RESISTANCE
• TRADO
• News Releases
• Contact

Pacific Bell - billing fraud & PERJURY!

Friday, December 17, 2004

12/13/04:  American Agencies motion for summary judgment granted - despite obvious perjury

Railroaded again!

It is absolutely amazing.  If I wanted to show how corrupt the legal system is, I couldn’t have asked for anything better.

The 12/13/04 Order - 16 pages.

In his 10/7/03 declaration, Zulkifli Iljas, Manager - Executive Office, Pac Bell, states that they SOLD this disputed debt “on or about 2/13/03” to American Agencies.

He also left out ALL assignments for collection, and that’s why Judge Broomfield decided that I couldn’t hold Pac Bell (now SBC) liable for Am. Ag. violations.

The Pac Bell filings

And regardless of the obvious differences between the Pac Bell and American Agencies declarations, just looking at Tom Wells’ various versions in his own declarations, it couldn’t be any more obvious what a lying scumbag Wells is.

Not only was Wells unable to put a correct company name in his own declaration and I had to point out that there is no such company, but one of my issues was their name and that they denied that “American Credit Agencies” had anything to do with my account while at the same time they did NOT dispute the authenticity of the Tom Wells answer to the small claims court FOR “American Credit Agencies.”

Of course that small claims court answer was nothing but lies too, as they now admit to all the FDCPA vioalation, but they are time barred since the SOL is only one year.  It would be difficult to dispute the authenticty of a document filed at the courthouse with Tom Wells’ original signature on it. 

Fortunately for American Agencies and all the corporate scum, federal court is obviously not very concerned with truth and justice.

And THAT explains why American Agencies ignored the small claims complaint, didn’t show up for the mandatory hearing, and couldn’t care less about perjury.

I’ve become conditioned to perjury and fabricated evidence, so this didn’t surprise me too much.  The junk faxers do it all the time, they submit totally fake documents to the court, claiming they got permission to fax.  And apparently that works.

The Experian declaration is hilarious.

I sued them in small claims court in 2002 for disclosure of the permissible purpose of all inquiries including the American Agencies inquiries.  They refused to give me the info, and I dismissed the small claims case because I didn’t know what to do.

After almost 2 years of litigation in federal court, which Experian of course is a party to, they didn’t think to let me know that all these credit reports stating that American Agencies received my credit reports are wrong.

Although, I really believe they lied in the declaration, which of course I couldn’t respond to because they attached it to their reply.

How a judge could allow this to stand without discovery, especially since not only MY exhibits show the “inquiries” (not changes or deletions) - MIS (CreditData SW) submitted a reports with these inquiries too.  Which I obviously pointed out during oral arugments.  And, my copy of the Experian declaration didn’t even look like an original, I thought it was a fax.

Well, that’s going to be very interesting, I’ll of course amend my complaint to include a new claim against Experian. 

I can see that they’re all tremendously enjoying this.  But what makes them think they’ll get away with either perjury or providing knowingly totally false information on the consumer reports?

The Experian conduct and refusal to disclose the permissible purpose for inquiries deserves a press release.

It’s rather funny that my AZ licensing claims were based on “debt management” companies, not collectors.  I just searched the A.R.S and all I could find was the requirement for a license in Title 6:

6-126 - Application fees for financial institutions and enterprises

American Agencies didn’t have a license back then, but since I’ve sued them, they did get licensed, with another new name: “American Agencies of California”

I’m wondering if it was pure genius by American Agencies to not point out that I had the wrong Article, knowing that if they did, I would have of course changed it.  By not saying anything, the judge just dismissed and I didn’t get a chance to fix that.

Is that an example of great lawyering?

I still don’t know if/when/how I can appeal.  Can’t figure this appeal thing out.

It’s definitely time for a press realease about the American Agencies and Pac Bell situation.  I don’t know how to word my claim in legalese, but Pac Bell sold my *debt* to American Agencies after I sued them in small claims and they KNEW that the debt was fraudulent.

There’s got to be something wrong with that, not just morally, but legally.  They even made a point to call me and to let me know!  It wasn’t about the $5 or $10 (if they got this much), they made sure I continued to worry about that collection.

Friday, May 21, 2004

RICO suit against Citibank for selling bk’d accounts, Sherman collects

I'm going to get that complaint on a slow day and see what I can find to use againt SBC (Pacific Bell.) I did NOT discharge my phone bill, I PAID it!!!! I got the cancelled check to prove it and I can prove that Pac Bell KNEW that I paid, they still sold the debt to American Agencies for collection.

It makes me furious every time I think about that. Not to mention the perjury by the SBC manager.

Anyway, check classaction.com for details on several Citi suits.

Saturday, March 06, 2004

Pacific Bell’s Zulkifli Iljas perjury

I already pointed out in my objection to the Pacific Bell motion to dismiss that Iljas completely misrepresented the facts about this phone bill and why it went to collections.

But I hadn't realized that his omitting facts is just as important.
Continue reading ...

Tuesday, February 24, 2004

Pacific Bell:  Appeal - Press releases - Retaliation

APPEAL

Judge Broomfield denied my motion for reconsideration and wrote:

"As part of its analysis, the court specifically queried whether Pacific might have an agency relationship with American Agencies. ... The court found that no evidence had been submitted which evidenced an agency relationship between Pacific and American. ... Pacific rebutted the agency relationship theory with the declaration of Zulkifli Iljas ...."

Could somebody please read the Zulkifli declaration and PLEASE tell me where the rebuttal is.

What am I missing?????????

Judge Broomfield wrote in his order to dismiss that I failed to supply any "competent evidence" and no affidavit to substantiate my allegations.

So, I verified my entire complaint, went through my Pac Bell exhibits in detail, spent a few hours getting it notarized, and then I'm told there's nothing new.

If American Agencies wasn't the agent for Pacific Bell, WTF were they doing collecting the Pacific Bell account???? Why am I suing them in this same action? DUH!

I feel like I'm talking to CRAs. How could I prove that they were the agent for Pacific Bell and that they didn't collect without authorization?????

Was I supposed to depose people or have witnesses at the hearing?

And why are the Pacific Bell declarations God's truth and everything I submit is deemed lies?

Well, I think I'll appeal this one. This ain't justice, I don't have the money, time and legal skills to sue in California.

And if I just let it go, the other defendants will pull that same shit. I'm tired of the lies.

PRESS RELEASES

It's about time I get started.

RETALIATION

If anyone has any suggestions on how I can do to Pacific Bell what they did to me, please let me know.

If you read the fax spam comments, you've seen the many ideas about calling the spammers on 800 #s, faxing black paper to waste their ink, etc.

I'm looking for something that'll REALLY cause them problems. I'd like their execs to worry like I did. Nothing criminal, but I'd love to do something that'll leave me saying: "Jurisdiction, jurisdiction!"

They not only sold the account for collection KNOWING that they had failed to credit my check, but they never once apologized and haven't offered one penny to settle.

I'm getting the feeling that Pacific Bell does this all the time. It's their routine.

Well, I'm in no hurry with my retaliation, there is no SOL and no jurisdiction.

I'll try the appeal and the press releases, see how that goes. If I can't find "justice" in the courts, I'm sure somebody will think of something good.

Monday, February 02, 2004

Posted Pacific Bell Order

I posted the order. I see a lot about my failure to provide "admissible" evidence. It reads to me like I should submit a motion for reconsideration with an affidavit and explain a few things.

Here's the faxed order:

http://forum.creditcourt.com/discus/messages/803/3527.html

If I should really find the time to file in California, do I have to name American Agencies there too?

That's really weird. And I just don't have the time. Still working 100 hour weeks and so behind on publishing filings and haven't done any press releases yet, it's really time to get the word out.

I'm not superwoman and my day has only 24 hours.

My head his spinning from all that jurisdiction talk.